Keine Antworten, nur Fragen, 19. September 2001

Erich von Däniken giebt sich nicht zufrieden mit alten Antworten. Doch seine faszinierende Betrachtungsweise liefert spannende Darstellungen und weckt die Neugier in jedem. Wer das Glück hatte, Herrn Däniken bei einer Vorlesung, oder im Fernsehn zu erleben, wird begeistert sein. Wer nicht, kauft sich am besten das VIDO und wird es bestimmt nicht bereuen.

       Here we go really to heaven!, 28. Juni 2000

If humanity believed in this book then man's life on earth may better many times. This book is really spiritual in a great sense. It throws the old and traditional idea within the human mind framework of the so called high values of religion and its practices, to dust. I admire that because those values are really faulty and that religion is prejudiced today, be it Chritianity, Islam, Judaism, Buddhism, Hinduism or any other religions (I myself am Hindu)! If you want to know why, then read this book. It came out of a Swiss man, if i am right! That is interesting for me to know too and i would try not to forget this book when i die.

       Don't get too scared now, 26. Mai 2000

Daniken has taken heat from every angle out there, New agers hate him and so do scientists.Why you ask? because this guy saw somthing others didn't he had a theory, one that shook the world at the foundations.Aliens starting civilization may sound odd at first but we have myth.Myth is a strong link to our past,we can learn more about real history.Daniken states that we should revaluate our written history and what could it contain.I looked to discredit his book as new age garbage but as I read through it I saw no mention of mana or Karmatic laws just maybe this could mean....!Daniken turned me on to learning more about history and theology, subject I thought I had a grasp on.He tackles histories odd balls, like the pri reis map or the Assyrian lens.And to say that there is any validity to his idea is academic suicide and labels you an nut who has no grasp on history.I get that every so often but he gets it everyday labed a fraud heretic among other things. I loved the book it was easy to understand and he didn't come off as the know all-be all, just a guy with an idea,an idea that scares people shakes there beleifs to the core.The evidence against his book uses conventual thinking, often proven wrong by common sense, if you know where to look.Daniken is right and others in the scientific commuinty know it, they are just scared of what could happen to there Dogma.

       Dogma?, 17. Mai 2000

When Aliens are mentioned people look around for the crazy guy who mentioned the "A" word. That subject gives people discomfort and a sense of skepticism. Daniken presents, in laymans terms his theory of Paleo-Seti. There is enough evidence to state that there is some validity in the book. From almost every culture have gods that decend from the sky and give Knowledge to the masses. There are buildings all over the world that couldn't have been built by such a primitive cultures Giza for one or almost every Maya Building ever created. Scientist hold on to there Dogma of how the world should be of course because we know everything about the past. We know that MAN is the greatest thing ever to exist. MAN is master of his domain nohing out anywhere is better than MAN. But to open minded people who can't find very much wrong with his book fall upon ridicule from the very people who should be interested in finding facts...Scientists. I know this book is hard to swallow what it says to me is we aren't alone, and we never where. Dogma is hard to overcome by any means No matter what you clucth when your faith is tested a cross or an beaker, There is more in heaven and Earth than we will ever know.

      DLL in San Diego, 16. Mai 2000

Unfortuantely, this was probably one of the first "UFO-related" books I read so I got off on a bad start on the subject material. Actually, since it was so ridiculous, I only was only able to read about the first half. If you have any scientific inclination or backgroud at all, this book is not for you. The writing constructs a house of cards by taking a few facts, building a few wild presumptions based on them, then making this all fact for the next chapter on which to build more conclusions. If there is anything here to be catorgized at all as "research", its a stretch. In the historical research vein, you're better off with the authors Zecharia Sitchin and Graham Hancock.